Two pages on one question: should you build here — and if so, on what terms? Read one before you buy one.
Whether to proceed and on what terms, on page one. Everything after it is evidence.
Each finding tells you what to have in hand before you ask for a vote — the fiscal package, the utility letter, the water plan.
How this particular board decides — a transactional negotiator, a gatekeeper, a rubber stamp — so you know which room you're walking into.
Moratorium, past projects, approval pathway, opposition capacity, fiscal need, shadow vetoes, water, power and more — the same twelve in every county.
Will the system let me build? Who will try to stop me? Does the math work? Answered in language you can lift into an IC memo.
Proceed, watch, or walk — and the specific documents to secure before spending another dollar.
Page one of a real Flyover — anonymized, exactly as it lands on your desk. The evidence is blurred here; request the sample to read it.
Anonymized from an actual Flyover. Place names, people, and organizations are fictional equivalents; findings are as delivered. Evidence text is blurred on the web — the full two-page report is available on request.
Ten candidate sites, one week, the same twelve indicators — so the shortlist is ranked on political risk, not just grid and land.
Know whether the county can approve a complete deal — and what "complete" means here — before you put money at risk.
Sites that clear the screen move to the Due Diligence Report: the full file on stakeholders, opposition, precedent, and terms.
Every consequential claim links to the public record. Analysts review every finding; an independent editor reviews every report.